Skip to content
Cloud Security DeskSearch
Menu

Technical guideAI systems

Know where cloud AI services process your prompts

Bedrock inference profiles, Foundry deployment types and Agent Platform endpoints each decide where a prompt is processed, separately from where data rests. Compare what each provider commits to and how to enforce it.

Published
Sources checked
Next review
Reading time
13 minutes
Coverage
Amazon Web Services · Microsoft Azure · Google Cloud
A grid of rounded region tiles. A dashed boundary encloses the left three columns. A solid blue path leaves a mint tile marked with a dark green pin, crosses the dashed boundary and ends at a tile on the far right marked with an amber pin; a dashed blue path from the same tile stays inside the boundary.
Conceptual illustration: the pin for stored data stays put while the routing choice decides how far the prompt travels for inference.

A comparison for reviewers approving generative AI on AWS, Azure or Google Cloud, based on provider documentation reviewed October 7, 2026. It separates processing location, data at rest and retained copies for each deployment option and gives policy examples, a comparison matrix and a decision flow.

At a glance

Key findings

  • Processing location is set by the Bedrock model or profile ID, the Foundry deployment SKU and the Agent Platform endpoint, separately from where data rests. [1][7][12]
  • Global options carry no processing residency on any of the three clouds: global. profiles, Foundry Global types and Google's global endpoint can each process a prompt in any supported region of that provider. [3][7][12]
  • Retained abuse monitoring copies follow different rules: Bedrock stores them in the destination Region, Microsoft in the resource's geography, Google in the project's region or multi-region. [5][8][14]
  • The EU differs by provider: Google's eu endpoint excludes the UK and Switzerland, while Microsoft's EU Data Zone follows the EU Data Boundary, which can include EFTA countries. [7][12]
  • The model can decide the answer: Claude Hosted on Azure offers Data Zone Standard only in the US, and Google lists country-level processing for few model entries. [9][12]

Processing, storage and logging are separate questions

On all three clouds, the setting that decides where a prompt is processed is chosen per call or per deployment, and it can change without touching anything about storage. In Amazon Bedrock it is the model identifier you send: a foundation model ID, a geographic inference profile such as one starting eu. or us., or a global. profile. [1] In Microsoft Foundry it is the deployment type, recorded on each deployment as a SKU name such as Standard, DataZoneStandard or GlobalStandard. [7] In Google's Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, the product formerly called Vertex AI, it is the endpoint hostname and location in the request: a regional endpoint, the us or eu multi-region, or the global endpoint. [11][13]

Each provider states its at-rest promise separately from its processing promise, and the at-rest promise does not widen when you pick a broader processing scope. Microsoft says data stored at rest remains in the designated Azure geography for every deployment type, while Global types may process inferencing data in any Azure region. [7] Google says data at rest stays in the customer-selected location independent of the endpoint called, and that the global endpoint gives no data residency guarantee. [12] AWS says that with a geographic profile your data remains stored only in the source Region by default, but prompts and outputs might move outside it during inference. [2] A storage commitment therefore tells a reviewer nothing about where the model ran.

The third question is copies. Retained abuse monitoring data, optional request logs, caches and stateful API features each carry their own location rule, and the rules differ in ways a residency review has to capture. Bedrock stores retained abuse detection data in the destination Region that processed the request. [5] Microsoft keeps its abuse monitoring store in the geography of the Foundry resource, even for Global and Data Zone deployments. [8] Google stores flagged prompt logs in the region or multi-region selected for the project. [14]

A review that asks only where data is stored will get a reassuring answer from every provider. Ask three things instead: where inference can run for this exact model and option, where anything persists, and which logs or retained copies exist and where they live. The sections below answer those for each cloud as documented on October 7, 2026. Network path is a fourth, separate matter: a private endpoint changes how traffic reaches the service, not which region processes the request.

Figure 01

One request, three location rules

The routing scope decides where inference runs; stored data and your own logs stay with the home location. [1][7][12]

Architecture diagram. An application sends a prompt to a home endpoint in a source Region, resource or project location. The home endpoint writes persisted features to data at rest and audit or invocation logs to customer logs, then resolves a routing scope set by the profile ID, deployment SKU or endpoint. The scope sends the request either to processing inside a boundary or, for global options, to processing anywhere. Both processing paths can produce a provider-retained copy for abuse checks, whose location varies by provider.

Source. Conceptual diagram based on AWS cross-Region inference, Microsoft Foundry deployment types and Google data residency documentation. [1][5][7][8][12][14]

Method. Conceptual architecture that generalizes three providers; provider-specific rules are in the comparison matrix and section text.

Accessible table and figure data
Figure 1 accessible table
ComponentRoleLocation rule
ApplicationSends the promptYour choice
Home endpointSource Region, resource or project locationFixed by your configuration
Data at restFiles, stored features, tuned modelsHome location or geography
Customer logsCloudTrail, invocation logs, request logsWhere you configure them; source Region on Bedrock
Routing scopeProfile ID, deployment SKU or endpointDecides where inference runs
Processing in a boundaryOne region, zone or jurisdictionScoped options
Processing anywhereAny supported region worldwideGlobal options
Provider retained copyAbuse monitoring dataVaries by provider
Figure 1 accessible table
ComponentRoleLocation rule
ApplicationSends the promptYour choice
Home endpointSource Region, resource or project locationFixed by your configuration
Data at restFiles, stored features, tuned modelsHome location or geography
Customer logsCloudTrail, invocation logs, request logsWhere you configure them; source Region on Bedrock
Routing scopeProfile ID, deployment SKU or endpointDecides where inference runs
Processing in a boundaryOne region, zone or jurisdictionScoped options
Processing anywhereAny supported region worldwideGlobal options
Provider retained copyAbuse monitoring dataVaries by provider

Amazon Bedrock inference profiles

Bedrock offers three processing scopes for on-demand inference. AWS describes cross-Region routing only through inference profiles, which define a model and the Regions a request can be sent to, which implies that a call naming a foundation model in one Region, without a multi-Region profile, is processed in that Region. [1][4] A geographic profile keeps requests inside a geography such as the US, EU or APAC; AWS gives the example that a request made within the US is kept within US Regions. [2] A global profile can send the request to any supported commercial AWS Region, and AWS prices it at roughly 10 percent below the geographic profile for the same model. [1][3] Not every model offers every scope in every Region: each model card's Regional availability table shows whether In-Region, geographic and Global options exist for a given Region. [4]

The storage wording is precise and worth quoting in a review. For geographic profiles AWS says data remains stored only in the source Region by default, while input prompts and output results might move outside the source Region during cross-Region inference. [2] The exception is abuse detection. Bedrock describes itself as zero data retention by default, but for a named list of models, currently including several OpenAI GPT models and Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 and 5.1, it may retain flagged or all traffic for up to 30 days, and with cross-Region inference those retained inputs and outputs are stored in the destination Region. [5] Profiles can also include opt-in Regions your account never enabled, and AWS notes that prompts and outputs may be stored there for abuse detection. [4]

Two details change how a profile should be verified. Destination Regions depend on the source Region you call from: AWS's example us. profile routes to three Regions when called from US East (Ohio) and two when called from US West (Oregon). [4] AWS also states that a geography-tied profile's destination list will never change, whereas a global profile gains Regions as AWS adds them. [4] For data residency requirements, AWS's instruction is to call GetInferenceProfile from every source Region you plan to use, read the destination Regions from the model ARNs in the models field, and not rely on the prefix in the profile ID. [4]

Customer-side records stay at home. CloudTrail logs every cross-Region inference request in the source Region, and the additionalEventData.inferenceRegion field identifies where it was processed. [1] Model invocation logging is off by default; once enabled it writes full request and response bodies to CloudWatch Logs or S3 destinations that must be in the same account and Region, with bodies over 100 KB and binary data going to S3. [6] For global profiles, CloudWatch and CloudTrail entries are also recorded in the source Region. [3] Invocation logging only captures calls through the bedrock-runtime endpoint; the same APIs on bedrock-mantle are not currently captured. [6]

Region-deny service control policies interact with profiles in ways that catch teams out. A geographic profile fails if any of its destination Regions is blocked, unless the SCP carries an exception keyed on the bedrock:InferenceProfileArn condition key. [2] Global profiles are authorized against a Region-agnostic foundation model ARN for which aws:RequestedRegion is unspecified, so a Region allowlist without that value blocks them, and an explicit deny on it combined with a global.* profile ARN turns global routing off. [3] The fragment below follows AWS's documented SCP for organizations that must not use global routing.

Example SCP fragment based on the AWS global cross-Region inference guide. Attach it to a test organizational unit first and confirm geographic profiles still work. [3]
{
  "Version": "2012-10-17",
  "Statement": [
    {
      "Sid": "DenyBedrockGlobalCrossRegionInference",
      "Effect": "Deny",
      "Action": "bedrock:*",
      "Resource": "*",
      "Condition": {
        "StringEquals": {
          "aws:RequestedRegion": "unspecified"
        },
        "ArnLike": {
          "bedrock:InferenceProfileArn": "arn:aws:bedrock:*:*:inference-profile/global.*"
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

Microsoft Foundry deployment types

Azure OpenAI models now sit inside Microsoft Foundry, which groups them with other Foundry Models sold by Azure, and the deployment types apply to the Serverless API deployment option; models running on managed compute do not use them. [7][8] Global types may process prompts in any Azure region. Data Zone types process only within a Microsoft-defined US, EU or Asia Pacific zone. Standard and Regional Provisioned process within the customer-specified Azure geography and might move between regions inside it for operational purposes. [7] Microsoft recommends starting with Global Standard, which gets new models first at the lowest price, and says new deployment types arrive in the order Global, Data Zone, then geography-based, with no guaranteed date for the last. [7]

Storage stays with the resource whatever the type. For Global and DataZone types, Microsoft says any data stored at rest, including uploaded data and the abuse monitoring data store, sits in the customer-designated geography, and only the location of processing changes. [8] Features that persist content, such as the Responses API, Assistants threads, stored completions and files uploaded for batch, store it in the Foundry resource within the same geography. [8] Global Batch shows the split clearly: input waits at rest in the designated geography until capacity is available, then processing may happen in any geography where the model is deployed. [8]

Abuse monitoring changes who can see content, not where it is kept. Flagged samples are reviewed by automated means, including LLMs, and by authorized Microsoft employees when needed; for models deployed in the European Economic Area those employees are located in the EEA. [8] Customers who meet Limited Access criteria can apply for modified abuse monitoring, which stops storage for human review, and an approved resource shows a ContentLogging capability set to false in its JSON view or in az cognitiveservices account show output. [8]

The EU zone needs a careful read. The deployment types page says the EU Data Zone follows the EU Data Boundary, which can include EFTA countries such as Norway and Switzerland, and that Microsoft can add regions to a data zone without prior notice. [7] The data privacy page describes an EU DataZone deployment as processing in that or any other EU Member Nation. [8] If an obligation names EU member states specifically, raise the difference with Microsoft and record its answer before relying on the zone.

Three options sit outside that scheme. DeveloperTier, meant for evaluating fine-tuned models for 24 hours, carries no data residency guarantee. [7] Claude models are sold and operated by Anthropic even inside Foundry: the Hosted on Azure option keeps data at rest in the selected geography and supports Global Standard and Data Zone Standard (US), while the Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure option may process data outside Azure and outside the selected region and offers Global Standard only. [9] Instant access, a preview that lets a West US 3 project call a model by name without a deployment, draws on a global quota pool, and Microsoft directs workloads that need data residency to create a deployment instead. [10]

Because the deployment type is a property of a resource, Azure Policy can enforce it when deployments are created. Microsoft documents a rule on the Microsoft.CognitiveServices/accounts/deployments/sku.name field; the example below inverts it into an allowlist so that any type not explicitly approved is denied. [7]

Foundry deployment types and processing scope, from Microsoft's deployment types page reviewed October 7, 2026. Data at rest stays in the resource's geography for all of them except Developer, which carries no data residency guarantee. [7]
Deployment typeSKU nameProcessing scope
Global StandardGlobalStandardAny Azure region
Global ProvisionedGlobalProvisionedManagedAny Azure region
Global BatchGlobalBatchAny Azure region
Data Zone StandardDataZoneStandardWithin the US, EU or APAC zone
Data Zone ProvisionedDataZoneProvisionedManagedWithin the US, EU or APAC zone
Data Zone BatchDataZoneBatchWithin the US, EU or APAC zone
StandardStandardWithin the resource's Azure geography
Regional ProvisionedProvisionedManagedWithin the resource's Azure geography
DeveloperDeveloperTierAny Azure region, no residency guarantee
Example Azure Policy rule that denies Foundry deployments outside an approved SKU list. Change the effect to audit for a first pass to find existing Global deployments, then switch it to deny. [7]
{
  "mode": "All",
  "policyRule": {
    "if": {
      "allOf": [
        {
          "field": "type",
          "equals": "Microsoft.CognitiveServices/accounts/deployments"
        },
        {
          "field": "Microsoft.CognitiveServices/accounts/deployments/sku.name",
          "notIn": [
            "DataZoneStandard",
            "DataZoneProvisionedManaged",
            "DataZoneBatch",
            "Standard",
            "ProvisionedManaged"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    "then": {
      "effect": "deny"
    }
  }
}

Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform endpoints

Google renamed Vertex AI to Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, and its documentation now uses that name, but requests still go to aiplatform hostnames. [11][13] Three endpoint families decide the ML processing location. Regional endpoints, which Google also calls locational, such as https://europe-west1-aiplatform.googleapis.com, keep ML processing within the broader multi-regional or country jurisdiction of that region, so a request to us-central1 is processed in the United States. [12] Multi-region endpoints at https://aiplatform.us.rep.googleapis.com and https://aiplatform.eu.rep.googleapis.com keep processing inside the US or the EU. [13] The global endpoint, https://aiplatform.googleapis.com with location global, may process a request in any Google Cloud location and provides no data residency guarantee. [12][13]

Google's EU boundary is narrower than Microsoft's. The eu multi-region covers EU member states only and excludes the United Kingdom and Switzerland. [12] Inside Europe, in-country processing depends on the model: Google says some models process locally in France or Germany while others are processed within the broader EU boundary, and it publishes per-model tables showing which locations carry an ML processing commitment. [12] The endpoints page adds that endpoints by themselves don't guarantee data residency or in-region ML processing, which is why the per-model table, not the hostname, is the document a review should cite. [13]

Counting the rows in Google's first-party model table shows how uneven that coverage is. Of 27 model entries listed on October 7, 2026, 26 carry both the US and EU multi-region commitments, yet no single country location covers more than 8, and Brazil, the Netherlands and South Korea cover one each. [12] A requirement for processing inside one specific country therefore narrows the model choice sharply, and it belongs at the start of model selection rather than at deployment.

Retained copies follow the project's location. When classifiers flag suspicious activity, Google may log prompts for up to 90 days in the region or multi-region selected for the project; these logs are not encrypted with customer-managed keys, and customers on a Google Cloud Master Agreement are exempt from this logging by default. [14] Models designated Advanced AI, including all versions of Claude Fable and Claude Mythos, have every prompt and response logged for up to 30 days in that same region or multi-region. [14] Gemini models also cache inputs and outputs in memory with a 24-hour TTL that Google says respects the selected location's residency, and caching can be turned off per project. Request-response logging to BigQuery is off unless you enable it per model and project. [15]

Grounding is where the documentation goes quiet about location. With Grounding with Google Search, Google stores logs of queries derived from prompts for up to three days for debugging, and that storage cannot be disabled; Grounding with Google Maps stores prompts, context and output for 30 days. [15] Neither entry says where those logs are kept. Until Google states a location for them in writing, a residency review should treat grounded requests as outside the boundary.

The global endpoint can be blocked with an organization policy. The constraints/gcp.restrictEndpointUsage list constraint is a denylist of API hostnames that applies at runtime to every resource in scope, and Generative AI on Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform is a supported service whose global endpoint is aiplatform.googleapis.com. [16] Google tells customers with DoD IL5 obligations to use this kind of policy to block global endpoint traffic for models not listed for the US multi-region. [12]

Example organization policy that denies the global Agent Platform endpoint and leaves regional and multi-region hostnames available. Apply it to a test project with gcloud resource-manager org-policies set-policy before wider rollout. [16]
constraint: constraints/gcp.restrictEndpointUsage
listPolicy:
  deniedValues:
  - aiplatform.googleapis.com
Figure 02

Country-level processing covers few Google model entries

26 of 27 entries carry US and EU multi-region commitments; no single country covers more than 8. [12]

Horizontal bar chart of Google first-party model entries listed as supported for ML processing at each location: US multi-region 26, EU multi-region 26, Japan 8, Canada 7, Singapore 7, United Kingdom 4, France 3, Australia 3, India 3, Germany 2, Brazil 1, Netherlands 1, South Korea 1.

Source. Calculated from the Google models table on Google's Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform data residency page, reviewed October 7, 2026. [12]

Method. Count of the 27 rows in the Google models table marked Supported in each location column. Rows include tuning, embedding and speech entries. Partner and open model tables are excluded.

Accessible table and figure data
Figure 2 accessible table
LocationModel entries
US multi-region26
EU multi-region26
Japan8
Canada7
Singapore7
United Kingdom4
France3
Australia3
India3
Germany2
Brazil1
Netherlands1
South Korea1
Figure 2 accessible table
LocationModel entries
US multi-region26
EU multi-region26
Japan8
Canada7
Singapore7
United Kingdom4
France3
Australia3
India3
Germany2
Brazil1
Netherlands1
South Korea1

Comparing the options

Side by side, the three clouds offer the same three tiers: one place, a provider-defined group of places, and anywhere. The differences sit in the fine print of each tier, and those are what an assessment should record.

Boundaries differ in how stable they are. AWS commits that a geography-tied profile's destination list never changes and creates new profiles when it adds Regions. [4] Microsoft reserves the right to add regions to a data zone without notice. [7] Google's per-model commitments live in a table that changes as models are added; the page was updated on the day this guide was reviewed. [12] A review record should name the page it relied on and the date it was read.

The EU is not one definition. Google excludes the UK and Switzerland from eu. Microsoft's EU zone follows the EU Data Boundary, which can include EFTA countries. AWS does not define the geography in prose so much as publish it: the destination Regions for each profile and source Region, which is the most checkable of the three forms. [12][7][4]

Retained copies land in different places. On Bedrock, a retained abuse detection copy is stored in whichever Region processed the request, so a global profile can leave a copy in any supported commercial Region for models that require retention. [5][3] Microsoft keeps the abuse monitoring store in the resource's geography regardless of deployment type. [8] Google keeps abuse logs in the project's selected region or multi-region. [14]

Per-request evidence differs as well. AWS records the processing Region of each cross-Region request in CloudTrail's additionalEventData.inferenceRegion. [1] The Microsoft and Google pages cited here describe processing scope as a property of the deployment type or endpoint and document no equivalent per-request field, so the evidence on those clouds is configuration evidence: the SKU on every deployment and the hostnames your code and policies allow. [7][13]

Figure 03

Same three tiers, different fine print

Global options remove processing residency on every cloud, and retained copies follow a different rule on each. [3][5][7][8][12][14]

Matrix of nine deployment options across Amazon Bedrock, Microsoft Foundry and Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, showing where inference can run, where data at rest is kept and where provider-retained safety copies are stored.

Source. Compiled from AWS, Microsoft and Google documentation reviewed October 7, 2026. [2][3][4][5][7][8][12][13][14]

Method. Source-derived summary of stated commitments. Retained copies apply only where a model or policy requires retention. Cells paraphrase the cited pages.

Accessible table and figure data
Figure 3 accessible table
OptionWhere inference can runData at restRetained safety copies
Bedrock model in one RegionThat RegionSource RegionThat Region
Bedrock geographic profileDestination Regions in the profileSource Region by defaultDestination Region
Bedrock global profileAny supported commercial RegionLogs in source RegionDestination Region
Foundry Standard or Regional ProvisionedResource's Azure geographyResource geographyResource geography
Foundry Data Zone typesUS, EU or APAC data zoneResource geographyResource geography
Foundry Global typesAny Azure region with the modelResource geographyResource geography
Agent Platform regional endpointRegion's jurisdiction; in-country varies by modelSelected locationProject region or multi-region
Agent Platform us or eu endpointInside the US or the EUSelected locationProject region or multi-region
Agent Platform global endpointAny Google Cloud locationSelected locationProject region or multi-region
Figure 3 accessible table
OptionWhere inference can runData at restRetained safety copies
Bedrock model in one RegionThat RegionSource RegionThat Region
Bedrock geographic profileDestination Regions in the profileSource Region by defaultDestination Region
Bedrock global profileAny supported commercial RegionLogs in source RegionDestination Region
Foundry Standard or Regional ProvisionedResource's Azure geographyResource geographyResource geography
Foundry Data Zone typesUS, EU or APAC data zoneResource geographyResource geography
Foundry Global typesAny Azure region with the modelResource geographyResource geography
Agent Platform regional endpointRegion's jurisdiction; in-country varies by modelSelected locationProject region or multi-region
Agent Platform us or eu endpointInside the US or the EUSelected locationProject region or multi-region
Agent Platform global endpointAny Google Cloud locationSelected locationProject region or multi-region

Choosing a configuration and proving it

Work from the obligation to the configuration. Write the boundary down as the contract or regulation states it, whether a country, the EU or a named list of regions, then choose the model, then the option, then the preventive control, then the evidence. Model choice comes before deployment choice because scoped options can arrive later than global ones, or not at all, for a given model. [7][12]

Take a hypothetical EU team that wants a current Claude model with processing inside the EU. On Bedrock it would choose an eu. profile and confirm the destination Regions with GetInferenceProfile from each source Region it calls. [4] On Agent Platform, Claude Opus 5.5 is listed with an EU multi-region commitment, so the team would call the eu endpoint and deny the global one. [12][16] On Microsoft Foundry the same requirement fails as of the review date: Claude Hosted on Azure offers Data Zone Standard only for the US, and the Anthropic-hosted option may process outside Azure. [9] The model, not each cloud's general residency story, decided the outcome.

Keep the evidence next to the decision so the next reviewer does not have to rebuild it.

  • Bedrock: profile IDs in code, GetInferenceProfile output for each source Region, the SCP text, and a CloudTrail sample showing inferenceRegion. [1][4]
  • Foundry: an export of every deployment with its SKU name, the Azure Policy assignment, and the hosting option for any Claude deployment. [7][9]
  • Agent Platform: the hostnames and locations in code, the gcp.restrictEndpointUsage policy, and a dated copy of the data residency table row for each model used. [12][16]
  • All three: the retention and abuse monitoring terms for each model, any exemption granted, and the location of every log your own team writes. [5][8][14]
Figure 04

Pick the boundary, then the model, then the option

A processing requirement is met only when a scoped option exists for the model and policy blocks the global one.

Decision tree with five questions: whether a contract or law limits processing location, whether the boundary is one country, whether it is a provider-defined zone such as the US or EU, whether the chosen model offers that option, and whether policy can block global options.

Source. Conceptual decision aid based on AWS, Microsoft and Google residency documentation. [3][4][7][12][16]

Method. Conceptual ordering of documented options. It does not replace legal review of the obligation itself.

Accessible table and figure data
Figure 4 accessible table
QuestionYesNo
Does a contract or law limit where prompts may be processed?Write the boundary as stated, then continueGlobal options are acceptable; still review retention
Is the boundary a single country?Use a single-region option the model lists thereAsk whether it is a provider zone
Is it the US, the EU or another provider-defined zone?Use a geographic profile, Data Zone type or multi-region endpointUse single-region options inside the boundary
Does the model you need offer that option?Deploy it and record the source page and dateChoose another model or provider
Can policy block global options for this workload?Apply the SCP, Azure Policy or endpoint constraintMove the workload to an account or project where it can
Figure 4 accessible table
QuestionYesNo
Does a contract or law limit where prompts may be processed?Write the boundary as stated, then continueGlobal options are acceptable; still review retention
Is the boundary a single country?Use a single-region option the model lists thereAsk whether it is a provider zone
Is it the US, the EU or another provider-defined zone?Use a geographic profile, Data Zone type or multi-region endpointUse single-region options inside the boundary
Does the model you need offer that option?Deploy it and record the source page and dateChoose another model or provider
Can policy block global options for this workload?Apply the SCP, Azure Policy or endpoint constraintMove the workload to an account or project where it can

Method and provenance

Source-led comparison of AWS, Microsoft and Google documentation on inference routing, data at rest, abuse monitoring and logging, with original diagrams and one count calculated from Google's published residency table. Sources were reviewed on October 7, 2026.

No cloud account, deployment or live request was used. Processing scopes, model availability and retention rules are bounded to the cited pages as of the review date and change frequently, especially per-model tables. Contractual terms such as data processing addenda were not analyzed.

AI assistance. AI assisted research synthesis, drafting, diagram planning and visual production, with deterministic editorial checks. No personal deployment experience, independent human review or live test is claimed.

Published under the Cloud Security Desk organizational byline. Read the practitioner guide policy.

References

  1. Geographic cross-Region inference Amazon Web Services. Accessed .
  2. Global cross-Region inference Amazon Web Services. Accessed .
  3. Supported Regions and models for inference profiles Amazon Web Services. Accessed .
  4. Amazon Bedrock abuse detection Amazon Web Services. Accessed .
  5. Monitor model invocation using CloudWatch Logs and Amazon S3 Amazon Web Services. Accessed .
  6. Instant access to models in Microsoft Foundry (preview) Microsoft. Accessed .
  7. Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform (formerly Vertex AI) Google Cloud. Accessed .
  8. Data residency, Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform Google Cloud. Accessed .
  9. Deployments and endpoints, Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform Google Cloud. Accessed .
  10. Abuse monitoring, Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform Google Cloud. Accessed .
  11. Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform and zero data retention Google Cloud. Accessed .
  12. Restrict Endpoint Usage organization policy Google Cloud. Accessed .